BAT CDC Documents
Project Cowper - Examination of Experimental Blends - Report No D 1417 Restricted
Fields
- Original File
- BATCO002
- URL
- http://outside.cdc.gov/images4/00/02/49/58/doc00001.TIF
- Company
- British American Tobacco
- Date Loaded
- 04 Mar 2003
- Author
- BROOKS GOCRELLIN RA
- Box
- B3190-6
Document Images
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION

P~In0RT NO. : ~ D. ~ |-7 CATEGORY:
PROJECT JO~ NO.-5~.05.O1 FILE NO.: l
AUTHOR: RAC~ ~C~
GROUP LEADER:
)[
c~
Check Lilt
Cover:
i
-~'~
Pho~oKraphs No. :
ReSuotions :
ISSUER: ~ ~v~
FS (~) : AJK (I)
TAPE REy:
: RAS (2) : RMC (I) : RSI; (3) : :.h~Er., F.. & D.D. Aust.
: CJP de S (i) : DGF (I) : Library (2) : F£1e
(2) :
I]S (I)
(1)!
(4)
Pre~e mash:or:
CozTec¢ ion~ (i)
Pzepa=e 1 ~our~ Co~"
i7
Da~e Date I Date
Sent RecdJ Reded
Checking
Author I~te
Issuer ~te
This p~ ~ is in, erred to £acilit~te and deta/1 the ;:~reso ot G.R. & D.C. B~-ts
~z~ the tTpes~-~ipt s~a~e until the ~eport is ~inally s~ved ~ issued. The I~o f~
should be co~menced at ~he time o£ 1~he i~la.l ~I=~ and &ccc.mpa~ l~he %~r----i1~ (and
=as~e~ a~e~ ~=.epa.-ati~n) a~ all rabsequen~ s~ages. I~ ~ust be se~ ~o eesr~-al £tl:L~g vl~r~
the m~T wh~ ~he report is issued.
~ot_...~e: I. %~e.Tever possible, ~ts £o~ %'ypln~ ~hould be ~rri~ten in ink.
2. After %'ypi~4~, the %~j~pes~ipt should normally be re.u---ned %o 1;he AuT/~:~,
who
will ~ubsequen~ly Obt:aiu ~he G~p Le~e~T'I and Imm~'I &~v~l.
CLTculation should be determined by ~he Issuer.
6. The t-ype$crip~ ~us~ no% be 1~Tesented £o~ p=intin~ ~il the Zesu~r has
inA~ialle~
~he p=~ £omma a~ "P~epa~e ~bu~ter".
~. A~e~ p~in~c:Ln~, one bound co1~y ~AS~ be returned to the Imsuer for final almpz~va!
and the 7ssuer will ensure tha~ one copy is seen by ~he Mana~rr.
Cr~
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION

AT'fENTIOR
Thla work was pro,lucud on the H~zgnctic Ca~d typcwr[l~cz.
Ir is imperativa that all correcticns, alterations, ~tc.,
arc made clearly. E.G. ~o,,cil}cd co,:r,.a_~s, full-stops could
be easily ndssed. A cro$s in =he margin, 1,, line with the
co~'rccLion would draw our aLtontion re th,2 insertion.
i~ottid yOU ple.,bc l,c hind c,ou[~.h to wz'~Lc" ]~,r~,...~e ill.~orLi¢,ns
¢,n o IL~i, nr, L~. ~hcct of p.~.t,t'r, and n__o~, cut: oui:: porLionr oI~
typed worl:. ?'his J.c l~¢.c;lusc tl,u tls~l,crJc Car..ls di£fu."
from ]'ap.::t- Tapes.
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
-,..j

INDEX
HAS
INDICATED
GAP IN
BATES
RANGE
HERE

PROJECT COWPER -
EXAMm&TION OF EXPERIMENTAL BLENDS
REPORT NO. RD.1417 RESTRICTED
1.10.1976
AUTHORS: R.A. Crellin
G. 0. Brooks
ISSUED BY:
D.J. Wood
PROJECT JOB NO: 33.03.02
DISTRIBUTION:
ii
Dr. S.J. Green Copy No. 1-8
Dr. D.G. Felton " " 9
Library " " 10, 11
COPY NO:
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
¢..m
.r,,,.a

INDEX
HAS
INDICATED
GAP IN
BATES
RANGE
HERE

T~C l GOB IT~I I
Group Research & Development Centre,
British-American Tobacco Co. Ltd.,
SOUTHAMPTON.
1st October 1976
PROJECT COWPER - EXAMn~ATION OF EXPERIMENTAL BLENDS
(Report No. ltD.1417 Restricted)
v
SUMMARY
Exper/mental flue-cured and blended ciKarettes provided by U.T.C.
(South Africa) have been evaluated by normal blend and smoke analyses,
O/WP analysis and taste and flavour subjective assessment.
U.T.C. require Co modify EMBASSY/B. & R. in such a way as to match
Rothmans smoke attributes (flue-cured experiment) whilst LUCKY STRIKE
modifications should result in Lexinston smoke attributes (blended
experiment).
The results of the analyses described in this report indicters thac
the flue-cured blend and smoke chemistry objectives could be reached
by increasing the domestic flue-cured content of the blend at the expense
of imported flue-cured and domestic liKht air-cured tobaccos. The PCL
which was examined appeared flue-cured in char&ater and did not alter
the O/WP pyridines/furfurale balance. Full O/WP analysis suEEested some
increase in irritation might result from i~s usa, however.
The blended objectives (blend and smoke chemistry) could be reached
by increasin8 the content of domestic and/or imported Burley in the
blend. Adjustment of the remainder of the blend (less domestic f~ue-cured
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
r~

INDEX
HAS
INDICATED
GAP IN
BATES
RANGE
HERE

-2-
and more domestic llghC air-cured) may have assisted in achievlns the
objective. In this case, since the added PCL in these samples was
flue-cured in type, th£s could not be incorporated without destroying
the match. PCL prepared from blended operations mighc, however, be
accepuable.
Long term panel tests are now in progress in South Africa to
evaluate these proposals.
V
BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
r,o

INDEX
HAS
INDICATED
GAP IN
BATES
RANGE
HERE
