Lorillard
Fields
- Author
- Zack, A.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT FILE ROOM
- Alias
- 85645978/85645986
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- FOOT, FOOTNOTE
- Named Person
- Surgeon General
- Arentzen, W.P.
- Evens, R.I.
- Geake, R.
- Gothowens, J.A.
- Milliken
- Sanborn, A.
- Arentzen, W.P.
- Recipient
- Fong, Ssn
- Document File
- 85645815 /85646194 /State Legislation Re: Michigan State Legislation
- Date Loaded
- 12 Feb 1999
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
- Jackson,Ls
- Mi Dept of Public Health
- Mi Education Assn
- Mi 4h
- Natl Inst on Drug Abuse
- Pta
- Senate
- Univ Houston
- Wayne County Council on Smoking + Heal
- Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
- Copied
- Geake, R.
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Site
- N14
- Master ID
- 85645816/6131
Related Documents:- 85645816-5817 Governor's Citizens' Panel on Smoking & Health
- 85645818-6131 Governor's Citizens'panel on Smoking & Health
- 85645819
- 85645820-5835 Minority Report
- 85645836-5837
- 85645869-5870 Memorandum of Understanding Between University of Michigan School of Public Health and Michigan Deptartment of Health
- 85645871-5872 Governor's Appointed Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645875-5878 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645879-5885 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645886-5890 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645891-5898 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645899-5902 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645903-5907 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85645911-5957 Smoking and Health in Michigan
- 85645958
- 85645959-5973 the Smoking and Helth Controversy: Another Side
- 85645987-5988
- 85645989
- 85645999-6000 Citizens Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646001
- 85646002-6003 Smoking and Health - Attention Public Heating Calling the Governor's Citizens Panel
- 85646004 Citizens Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646005-6006
- 85646007
- 85646008
- 85646009-6011
- 85646012-6013 Governor's Citizen's Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646014
- 85646015
- 85646016-6017 Summary Research Findings on Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking
- 85646018
- 85646019 Position Paper on Smoking and Health
- 85646020-6021 Smoking
- 85646022
- 85646023 Citizens Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646024-6025
- 85646026 Testimony to Citizens, Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646027-6028 Testimony to the Governor's Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646029-6031 Statement Governor's Citizens Panel on Smoking and Health Submitted to the Office of Health Education Michigan Department of Public Health in Behalf of United Connunity Services of Metropolitan Detroit 801008
- 85646032 the Governor's Citizens Panel on Smoking and Health the Metropolitan Detroit Coalition for High Blood Pressure Control Public Hearing Comment on Smoking and Health 801008
- 85646033-6034
- 85646035-6038 Statement Givenby Dr. Murray Jackson in Behalf of the American Lung Association of Southeastern Michigan to the Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health - Wednesday, 801008
- 85646039-6045
- 85646046-6047 Open Letter and Statement to the Citizen's Panel on Smoking & Health
- 85646048-6052 Cost Effectiveness and Benefits of Smoke Stoppers Program As Compared to Two Other Popular Smoking Cessation Programs
- 85646053-6056 Statement of W. A. Wickman, General & Legislative Counsel Michigan State Chamber of Commerce to Governor's Panel on Smoking & Health 801008
- 85646058
- 85646059 Panel Report & 'illustration'
- 85646060-6061
- 85646062-6063
- 85646064-6067
- 85646068
- 85646069
- 85646070-6071
- 85646072-6073
- 85646074-6075
- 85646078 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646079
- 85646080
- 85646081-6084
- 85646085
- 85646086-6087
- 85646088-6089
- 85646090
- 85646091-6092 A Proposed Michigan Clean Air Act
- 85646093-6095
- 85646096
- 85646097
- 85646098-6105
- 85646106-6107 Smoking and Insurance
- 85646108-6109
- 85646110
- 85646111 Update on the Resource People Selected to Represent Various Bureaus in the Michigan Department of Public Health
- 85646112-6113 Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health
- 85646114-6116
- 85646117-6120
- 85646121
- 85646122
- 85646123
- 85646124
- 85646125
- 85646126-6127
- UCSF Legacy ID
- cxg40e00
Document Images
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
F
25291 Wykeshire Road
Farmington, Hills 48013
August 8, 1980
Mr. Sunny Sun Nai Fong
Michigan Department of Public Health
Office of Health Education
3500 N. Logan Street
Box 30035
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Dear Mr. Fong:
I am submitting the following statement which I hope you will share with
the Citizens' Panel on Smoking and Health which was appointed by Governor
Milliken for the purpose of soliciting recommendations on how to reduce
tobacco related disabilities.
I am a high school principal with some 15 years in this position in the
school districts of Detroit and Livonia. I am a member of the Board of
Directors of the Wayne County Chapter of the American Cancer Society and
I served for many years as a member of the Wayne County Council on Smoking
and Health.
I strongly urge the members of the committee to support the recommendations
made in Senate Bill #388 as originally introduced by Senator Robert Geake.
This bill would have banned smoking in all public schools and on public
school property by all persons - board of education members, parents,
superintendents, principals, teachers, support staff and students.
Both the office of the United States Department of Health, Education and
Welfare as well as the Surgeon General of the United States have recognized
that preventive education is the most valuable way to protect our young
from the pernicious effects of smoking and the seductive and beguiling
influence of tobacco advertising.
As long as smoking is permitted in the school setting, any preventive
education program regarding the adverse effect of smoking will be largely
unsuccessful and well meaning efforts to teach the full meaning of the
warning which is written on every package of cigarettes will be undermined.
When we permit smoking by anyone in the school setting, we mortgage our
credibility because we are telling children "Do as I say and not as I do".
Navy Surgeon General Willard P. Arentzen has stated what is perhaps the
most cogent reason to justify such legislation. "We must not only recognize
that tobacco smoking is harmful, but must behave in a manner consistent with
the knowledge that smoking is a health hazard."
Senate Bill #388, as oriainally introduced, would make it easier for school
personnel to enforce smoking prohibitions in the school setting where peer
influence is so comoelling. The message to students is that "No one smokes
here - neither principal, secreta ry, custodian, parent nor student."
-132-
1
~

I
Those adults who elect to work in the school setting with children have a unique
obligation to set a personal example by not smoking on school premises. Legis-.
lation which prohibits smoking in schools is no more a denial of civil liberties
or work rights than comparable existing legislation which prohibits the drinking
of alcohol on school property or which bans smoking in supermarkets. Neither is
it an attack upon free choice or the free enterprise system. It is, instead,an
effort to save lives and to counter in our schools the influence of cigarette
promotion which portrays smoking as a glamorous activity.
I understand that Senate Bill #388 was amended to allow approved smoking areas
for staff because of the intervention of the Michigan Education Association. it
is regretm ble that the media failed to appropriately publicize this action which
in effect emasculated the intent of the bill. The public has a right to know
when legislation to protect the health of children is compromised by a special
interest lobby.
I am bothered also by the absence of concern on the part of local, state and
national leadership of PTA with regard to the influence of smoking on the health
of children. I was heartened by their commendable concern about excessive vio-
lence on TV and its effect upon children. The violence to children who fall
victim to the seductive advertising of the tobacco industry, however, is an even
more ominous threat to the safety of'children and is equally deserving of protest
and calls for corrective action by the PTA.
Without an overall cortmitment to prohibit all smoking in the school setting, the
preventive education efforts of school programs to teach about the dangers of
smoking will be compromised. Research tells us that young people are more afraid
of being rejected by their friends than of losing years of their lives. Approved
smoking areas for students stimulate peer pressure to smoke and foster the sale and
use of Illegal drugs. Staff members who smoke in the school setting separate
themselves from the problem and their absence of commitment mocks the integrity
of the school's health education Instruction. This anomaly Is perceived by even.
little children.
The State of Arizona has already acted with courageous responsibility on behalf
of the safety of its children by banning smoking on public school property. Can
we do less for our own children? Approved smoking areas for staff and students,
like the ever present ash tray, give license to the practice and conceal the
i ns id i ous dangers 4rh i ch attend.
Very truly yours,
~. _ _ .
Albert Zack
AZ/mb
cc: Senator Robert Geake
I
I
I
I
I
E
I
L
L
-133-

I
I
P
I
I
I
L
L
L
Adolescence is a time when individuals first begin to make decisions
that have lifelong consequences. One of these decisions for many young
people is whether or not to smoke cigarettes. Those of us who are deeply
concerned and involved with youths need to be aware that we can have an
impact on that decision--through the programs we provide, the policies
we institute and the interpersonal relationships we cultivate with
young people.
Preventing adolescents from smoking before they begin involves a
more comprehensive effort than the traditional "scare tactic" approach.
Adolescence is a time for trying on new behaviors and taking new risks.
"Scare tactics" may serve to challenge and tempt the very young people
we aim to convince. Richard I. Evens of the University of Houston talked
about the inaopropriateness of traditional approaches for young people:
"Anti-smoking messages focus too much on the futu:-e dangers. Children
are more likely to focus on the present."1 Evens, citing two other
studies aimed at finding out what works and what doesn't work in anti-
sinokino campaigns, concluded that no-smoking messages were more effective
when they included students themselves showing how to say no to peer
pressures to smoke than when they employed the use of authority figure
adults presenting high fear arousal messages.
Smoking prevention can be appropriately placed within the larger realm
of substance abuse prevention. This view define$ a substance as any
chemical th3t brings about physical, emotional or mental changes in a
Statement sucmit'r.ed by Judy Ann Got':-CtaL-_ns, 4-H Ycuth Prograr,ts, August, 1980.
-134-

I
A
person. Abuse is the use of a chemical substance in such a way that
it causes physical, mental or social harm to a person or to people close
to him or her. Thus, smoking tobacco can be seen as substance abuse. The
current prevention approaches to substance abuse which emphasize the
development of life skills are appropriate as ap approach to smoking
prevention, as well as being consistent with the goals and philosophy
of the %iichigan 4-H - Youth Programs.
The major goal of the Michigan 4-H - Youth Programs is to help
young people become self-directing, productive, and contributing members
of society. In order to achieve this goal, 4-H strives to assist both
youths and volunteers in the acquisition of the following life skills:
- learning how to learn,
F
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
- relating to change,
- using knowledge, and
- developing self.2
The Michigan 4-H - Youth Programs'believes that a basic need of
all human beings is to develop and enjoy caring relationships with
others. There is a commitment to helping these relationships evolve
into quality human interactions. This is accomplished by making it
possible for volunteers to interact with youths on a continuing basis
in a group setting.
Primary prevention strategies are largely psycho-social, people-
oriented approaches concerned with reducing the demand for the substance,
in this case tobacco. The goals are to nurture and help a person grow
and mature without reliance on chemical substancps.
]
I
I
E
~
L
~
L
.~

i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
L
L
L
L
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has developed a matrix
for prevention that encompasses ~our catecories of activities: information,
education, alternatives and early interrention. According to Lura Street
Jackson, program advisor at the NIDA, a good comprehensive program
includes all four types of activities.3 An elaboration of this matrix
and an investigation of the current ?iichigan 4-H projects and programs
serve to emphasize the consistency between the 4-H philosophy and the
primary prevention model.
Information--The first component described involves providing accurate
and honest information. Information should be seen as an important
adjunct to a good prevention program, but that information should not
stand alone. Research studies have shown that factual data, widely
used as the sole prevention tool in earlier years, frequently generated
more curiosity in young people than wisdom."4 Yet, information
appropriately targeted at specific audiences can be an important tool
in smoking prevention.
The dissemination of information is a basic component of 4-H in
its linkage to the land-grant universities. 4-H continues to serve as
an important means for extending the findings of the land-grant
institution to the people, whether the research deals with improving
interpersonal communication skills or the latest findings about smoking
and health. The linkage with subject-matter expertise at the land-grant
universities ensures that the 4-H agents
and the people with whom they
work will be kept up to date on the latest research. The university
extends information into the home in the form of home visits, bulletins
and radio or television programs.s
_136-

I
Two current Michigan 4-H orojects are concerned d?:ectly with
providing health information to 4-H members and to the public in general.
Through Health Fairs and Health Awareness Teams, II-H members become
personally involved in a variety of health topics, including smoking.
Education--Education is seen by preventors today as a process that
helps individuals develop the skills they need to help themselves. This
education includes not only the development of the intellect, but
attention to emotional development and opportunities for growth. The
activities may include development of decision-making skills, values
awareness, problem-solving, development of communication and inte:-personal
skills, and career education and the development of knoKledge, skills
and attitudes useful in the work place. An ii-inportant part of this
component is the training of teachers and leaders in these skills.
Through this system of trained volunteer leaders and small group
settings, 4-H has many programs focused on just this aspect of education.
For example, High On Myself is a program of self-inquiry and intergroup
sharing and includes exercises in communication skills, values clarification,
problem-solving skills, decision-making skills and stress reduction.
Other examples include the Peer-Plus, Group Dynamite, Stress Connection
and Starship Self programs. Informal evaluations have shown that 4-H is
effective in improving difficult to measure hunan resource attributes of
self-esteem, confidence and the ability to cope with stress.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
L
L
-137-

I
I
I
I
I
I
Alternatives--The strategy of this component is to provide experiences
where young people can develop the positive skills and feelings t'.:ey
need to become mature people. These programs should furnish ooportsnities
that provide adventure, involvement, open and direct communications with
others, creativity, or the sense of accomplishment and personal potency
that comes from being able to control or change one's environment.
Michigan 4-H - Youth Programs is a perfect example of a community
program that can provide these kinds of challenges. 4-H provides
opportunities for youths to experience success. Khether through completing
a tie-dye project in African Cultural Heritage, growing vegetables, nego-
tiating a bicycle safety course, or chairing a meeting, 4-H can help
counteract the feelings of hopelessness and disappointment often
prevalent among some of today's youths.
Early Intervention--Early intervention involves giving support to young
people during the crises of growing up. Adolescence is the time for
growing up, and the target audience for 4-H is youths aged 9 to 18.
Reaching out toward special groups, including multicultural groups,
ethnic minorities, handicapper youths and rural and urban groups,
4-H recognizes the diversity of the youth population and the multitude
of crises that growing up can present.
The National Institute of Drug Abuse has found that the most
significant aspect of any program attempting to prevent substance abuse
is that the program involve both.youths and adults, with adults doing
things with kids, not for or to them.

I
Thus it see:is that the Michigrn -':outh Programs u;.d the
primary prevention model of smoking prevention share a common outlook
toward youths. In particular, 4-H and the ;lIDA•support the following
objectives:
- Improving decision-making skills
- Improving co,:,.munication and interrersonal relationships
- Improving health habits and health education
- Providing appropriate role models for youths
- Encouraging the young to respect themselves
- Releasing the imagination, curiosity, creativity, and
compassion that are natural expressions of young people
Identifying the resources of our cocrnunities--knowledge,
skills, generations, heritages, and cultures--to create a
strong and cohesive environnent.I
Young people who have developed effective communication and decision-
making skills are those who will be most likely to seek out information
and use that information to make wise decisions regarding smoking and
health. Giving young people the kinds of attention and experiences
can help them to grow up will have positive lifelong consequences.
that
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
L
L
L
L
-139-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1Richard I. Evens, "Tobacco," D rsg Uodate. Vol. 1, No. 2, September 1973.
2From the Michigan 4-H - Youth Programs Mission Statement.
'Lura Street Jackson, "Some Promising Strategies and Models in
Prevention Programming," a paper presented at the Seventh International
Congress on the Prevention and Treatment of Drug Dependence, Lisbon,
Portugal, October 18, 1977.
4Ibid.
SAbigail Sanborn, "4-H: A SVise Investment of Our Tax Dollars,"
%,tichigan 4-H - Youth Programs, 1979.
6Ibid.
7Drug Abuse Prevention, National Institue on Drug Abuse, 1973,
DHEW Publication `o. (ADM) 78-586.
-140-
