Product Design
A Critical Review of "Toward a Less Hazardous Cigarette," Research from NCI's Smoking and Health Program
Abstract
Summarizes the effects of experimental cigarettes on laboratory animals. States the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health program to investigate a less hazardous cigarette spanned 10 years and included in vivo and in vitro testing, skin painting and cytotoxicity assays. Summarizes the design elements of experimental cigarette construction, reports findings and accounts for variables. Cites deficiencies of data, incomplete nitrate research and confusing nomenclature as being problematic and states "There is one physical characteristic in this study which correlates very well with tumorigenic activity; this is the static burn rate."
Fields
- Author
- Slaven, R.W.
- Recipient
- Spears, Alexander White, III (LOR President & CEO)Associated with CTR, used as an expert in the Mississippi case.
- Schultz, Frederick J., Ph.D. (VP of Lorillard, Inc. '89-95)
- Tucker, Charles. L., Jr. (Lor, Product Development Manager, 1979-1983)
- Patterson, R.B.
- Ireland, Mary Sue (Lor, Product Composition Chemist, 1965)
- Minnemeyer, Harry J. (Lorillard R&D Dept.; worked on nicotine augmentation project)
- Schultz, Frederick J., Ph.D. (VP of Lorillard, Inc. '89-95)
- Hypothesis
- Design changes over timeChanges in cigarette design over the past half century.
- FTC machine testing and ratings
Design changes to achieve altered FTC smoke machine tar and nicotine ratings, with or without measured changes in human intake.- Health effects
Design changes which have measurably altered health effects of cigarette smoke, both for smokers and nonsmokers.- Inhalation Profile
Are cigarettes designed to cater to individual inhalation profiles?- Introduction of new/unconventional products
Research and development of novel nicotine delivery devices and experimental tobacco designs.- Measuring overall toxicity
Development of scientifically valid protocols and methods for testing the health and toxicity effects of changes in product design.- Smoke constituent testing
Development of methods for measurement of gas and particulate yields in mainstream and sidestream smoke.- Toxicity and consumer intake
Development of scientifically valid procedures for measuring biological activity and neurological effects of nicotine and smoke constituents.- Use of additives
Modification of tobacco products through use of additives and measuring effects on dependence, behavior, and toxicity.- Use of filters, paper, and ventilation
Modification of tobacco products through use of filters, paper, and ventilation, and measuring effects on dependence, behavior, and toxicity.- Use of tobacco processing/ blends
Modification of tobacco products through changes in tobacco processing and use of blends, and measuring effects on dependence, behavior, and toxicity. - FTC machine testing and ratings
- Keyword
- Animal testing
- Brand Specifications
- Burn rate control
Burn rate is controlled through use of burn additives, density, paper, etc.- Carcinogenic (Cancer-causing)
- Ciliatoxic
- Delivery modification
- Mutagenic
- Pyrolysis
- Reaction products
- Safer cigarette
- Smoking and Health Controversy
- Toxicity
- Tumorigenic
- Brand Specifications
- Additive
- Cocoa (Chocolate) (Cocoa Shells, Extract, Distillate and Powder)Composed of nearly 400 identified chemical substances as of 1967
- glycerin
- Invert sugar
- Magnesium nitrate
- Potassium bicarbonate
- glycerin
- Smoke Constituent
- acrolein
- Carbon monoxide
- formaldehyde
- Hydrogen cyanide (HCN)
- Isoprene
- Nicotine
- Nitric oxides
- Phenols
- Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
- Carbon monoxide
- Design Component
- Air dilution
- Bright tobacco (Flue-cured tobacco)
- Burley tobacco
- Burn rate
- Cellulose acetate filter (CA filter, Conventional filter)
- Charcoal filter
- Maryland tobacco
- Oriental tobacco (Turkish)
- Paper porosity (Natural permeability or NP)
- Pressure drop (PD, Resistance to draw (RTD), Flow rate or Draft)
- Reconstituted tobacco
- Humectant
- Bright tobacco (Flue-cured tobacco)
- Named Organization
- National Cancer Institute NCIDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute located in Rockville, MD
- University of Kentucky
- Subject
- additives
- Blends (Design)
- Burn Rate (Design)
- Density (Design)
- Experimental Technology (Technology)
- Filters (Design)
- health effects
- Humectants (Additives to maintain moisture)
- Metabolites (Measures)
- Paper (Design)
- Pressure Drop (Design)
- Reconstituted Tobacco (Design)
- Smoke Constituents
- Smoke Deposition (Measures)
- Smoke Nicotine (Measures)
- Tar (Measures)
- Test/Animal Subject (Testing)
- Test/Butt Analysis (Testing)
- Test/Skin Painting (Testing)
- Test/Smoke Condensate (Testing)
- Test/Smoke Constituents (Testing)
- Test/Toxicity (Testing)
- Tobacco Type (Design)
- Transfer to Smoke (Measures)
- Ventilation (Design)
- Blends (Design)
- Brand
- 1R1
Document Images
Accession number 1657
Lori//ard Researcii Center
Greensboro
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF "TOWARD A LESS HAZARDOUS CIGARETTE,"
RESEARCH FROM NCI'S SMOKING AND HEALTH PROGRAM
Submitted by: R. W. Slaven
Report number: Date:May ag , 1981
Summary or Abstract:
Results of toxicity and tumorigenic activity tests conducted
on experimental cigarettes are summarized. Several of the statis-
tical analyses were found to be unreliable. The implications of
findings on nicotine, hydrogen cyanide and acrolein are discussed.
/fr
XC:
Dr.
A.
W.
Spears
Dr.
Mr.
Dr.
Ms.
Dr. F.
C.
R.
M.
H. J.
L.
B.
S.
J. Schultz
Tucker
Patterson
Ireland
Minnemeyer
Library

INTRODUCTION
During the 1970's the National Cancer Institute, under the
auspices of its Smoking and Health Program, conducted a series of
experiments designed to evaluate the relative effects on labora-
tory animals of smoke and smoke condensates derived from especial-
ly prepared experimental cigarettes. These experiments,generally
entitled "Towards a Less Hazardous Cigarette," were carried out in
four distinct steps from their inception in 1970 to the issuance of
the last report in September, 1980. The data and conclusions in
the public reports (1-5) are the main subjects of this review.
Reference is also made to a separate study (6) which is concerned
with results obtained using cigarettes equipped with experimental
filters.
EXPERIMENTAL OUTLINE
Experimental cigarettes were prepared by a different major
American cigarette manufacturer for each set of tests. All con-
structions were assigned a code number for subsequent identifica-
tion. The variations incorporated in these cigarettes are outlined
below. The cigarettes were analyzed at several different laboratories
for major chemical constituents and physical parameters of the con-
struction, blend, smoke and smoke condensate. The major tests con-
ducted to determine the effects of smoke were in vivo and in vitro
ciliary transport inhibition and inhibitions of phagocytosis by alve-
olar macrophages. The effects of the condensate were tested by skin-
painting bioassays on mice and cytotoxicity studies (for descriptions
of these tests see Appendix A). Statistical analyses of the data
generated were carried out independently of the experimental labora-
tories.
Summary of Series #1 Cigarettes Results
The standards in this and subsequent studies were the 1R1
cigarette developed by the University of Kentucky and a standard
experiment blend, SEB, prepared to represent an average unfiltered
American cigarette marketed in 1970. The composition of SEB is
given in Table 1. A total of 21 modifications were prepared for
this first study.
Table 1
Composition of SEB
Glycerine 2.80%
Invert Sugar 5.30
Flue-Cured 32.54
Burley 20.04
Maryland 1.06
Turkish 11.09
Reconstituted
Sheet 27.17

- 2 -
The construction was altered by changes in paper porosity and
the tobacco cut. The blend itself was modified by variations
in the stem and leaf content, incorporation of blend components
into the reconstituted sheet (RTS) and the addition of nitrate.
The differences in test results generated by these variations
were not great. In fact, only the mouse skin paintings with
smoke condensate gave statistically different activities. of
the seven variations which gave significantly lower tumorgeni-
city than SEB-l, six involved cigarettes made completely from
different types of RTS. The seventh was a cigarette made en-
tirely of stems (Ref. 1, pp. 11, Table 4). Some improvement
was found with use of high porosity paper. Low porosity paper
and lamina only blend scored very poorly being twenty-first
and nineteenth respectively, in rank by number of surviving
mice. Doubling the nitrate content had no significant effect.
Correlations were drawn between the activities of the con-
densate and the characteristics of the blend such as TVB's,
total nitrogen and nicotine content, and physical characteristics
of the cigarettes such as average weight, burn rate, pressure drop
and others. The results were, in general, as expected with higher
activity related to increased tar yields (Ref. 1, pp. 132, Table 15;
pp. 133, Table 18). The vapor phases and smoke condensates were
analyzed for chemical constituents and the correlations of these
constituents derived. In the condensates,nicotine, isoprene and
palmitic acid showed the highest correlations with increased ad-
verse activity (Ref. 1, pp. 134, Table 22). Interestingly, poly-
aromatics and phenols did not correlate as well. From the gas
phase only HCN was shown to have a positive relationship to in-
creased activity (Ref. 1, pp. 138, Table 24). The question of the
appropriateness of these gas phase analyses will be discussed in
another section of this report.
Summary of Series #2 Results
The variables in these experiments included weight of the
cigarettes, aeration of the burning zone, use of high and low
nicotine tobaccos, the concentration of fertilizer used in culti-
vation, and fatty alcohol treatmen for sucker ontrol. Addition-
ally, the non-tobacco fillers NSM ~ and Cytrel were tested. These
materials are referred to as ASM-A and ASM-B, respectively, in the
report (Ref. 2).
In this series the toxicity tests gave a considerably larger
range of.results than was seen in Series #2. This is especially
apparent'with ASM-A and ASM-B. ASM-B had the lowest activity in
the inhibition of ciliary transport, inhibition of phagocytosis
and cytotoxicity tests. ASM-A was third best in the first two of
these and second in the last (Ref. 2, pp. 92, Table 1). It was in
the skin-painting bioassays where a large difference between these
materials was seen. With ASM-A the number of mice to exhibit tumors
was only 13 to 18% of the standard, whereas, ASM-B recorded 36% to 40%
more. ASM-A was the best material tested and ASM-B the worst. Con-
densates from both cigarettes were high in polycyclic aromatics.
89771784

- 3 -
ASM-B condensate was higher in phenols than ASM-A but not out of
the range of ordinary tobacco (Ref. 2, pp. 46, Table 8). Thus,
no good correlation for the high adtivity of ASM-B in the mouse
dermal bioassay was found.
The other variations in blend and construction were of little
significance with the exception of the use of high and low nicotine
tobaccos. As in the first report, increases in adverse physiological
responses, including tumorigenicity, were found to correlate with ,
increased nicotine content of the smoke and smoke condensate.
Summary of Series #3 Results
Changes in paper porosity, filter design and the effect of
several additives, including sugar, humectants and cocoa, were tested
in this series. Additionally, ASM-A and ASM-B were retested.
The use of additives gave the most interesting results from this
series. The addition of magnesium nitrate at a 5.7% w/w level gave
a reduction of tumor bearing mice in the skin-paintings of 24% to
48% depending on dose level (Ref. 3, pp. 137-8, Tables 2 and 3). Un-
fortunately, this compound had deleterious effects in the cilia toxi-
city and cytotoxic potency tests (Ref. 3, pp. 168, Table 1). Cocoa
powder exhibited a positive correlation with adverse effects in all
three tests (pp. 33, Table 10 and pp. 168, Table 1). The deletion
of sugar or glycerin had no statistically significant results.
The use of high porosity paper and an air dilution filter gave
very low activity in the skin painting bioassay (Ref. 3, pp. 36,
Table 12). However, very little beneficial effect from this con-
struction was noted in either the ciliatoxicity or cytoxicity tests.
The retesting of the artificial smoking materials gave very similar
results to those found in Series #2.
Summary of Results of Series #4
The majority of the cigarettes prepared in this series consisted
of refinements on the variations tested previously, such as nicotine
content, paper porosity, bright and burley content and repeated tests
on ASM-A and ASM-B. No great differences from the previous results
were found.
New variations included different processes for RTS production,
changes in the puffed tobacco and the use of insecticide-free tobacco.
None of these changes gave results significantly different from the
standard. A cigarette made entirely from expanded stems displayed
the lowest correlation with tumorigenic activity in this series. This
result was not surprising in view of the effect shown by an all-stem
cigarette in Series #1.
Summary of Experimental Filter Results
Tests on a variety of filter constructions were carried on
during the mid 1970's. This work dealt only with the toxicity
tests and no dermal bioassays were done. The results were reported
89771785

4
separately (6) with no referencing to the work already discussed.
The variations in filter design included the use of cellulose,
cellulose acetate and charcoal; addition of acid, base or oxidi-
zing agent; and air dilution. It was found that addition of po-
tassium bicarbonate, polyol or polyolimine to a cellulose filter
and air dilution all contributed to an overall lowering of smoke
toxicity.
Analysis of Experimental and Statistical Methods
While in general, this study was done in a highly competent
manner there are certain aspects which bear close scrutiny. One
of the overall problems with the program was its size and duration.
The data was basically collected on variations of a 1970 vintage
unfiltered cigarette. Of the 118 different cigarettes prepared
in the main set of work exactly 5 had filters (only 2 being air
diluted) and 3 had high porosity paper. Thus, much of the data
generated does not bear directly on the concerns of the 1980's
marketplace.
The use of additives to mitigate deleterious effects of ciga-
rette smoke was one facet of this study. Yet the work done with
nitrate is less than complete. Previous to this project several
reports had appeared in the literature which indicated that addi-
tion of nitrate to the tobacco blend suppressed tumorigenic activi-
ty in dermal bioassays. Cigarettes prepared in Series #1 with
0.71% nitrate, approximately double the natural level, did not ex-
hibit this effect. Yet cigarettes with 5.7% nitrate made in Series
#3 were quite effective in this regard. No comment is made in the
report summary about these results nor was any attempt made to find
an effective threshold. The addition of nitrate has the unfortunate
side eff ect of increasing the potency of the smoke in the toxicity
tests (Ref. 3, pp. 173, Table 4). This problem was overcome by
addition of 6.9% zinc oxide. No comment was made on this result
and the matter was not investigated further. In Series #1 the Code
13 and 14 cigarettes contained only stems and scored very well in
the tumorigenicity test. The impression is left that this was due
to the low tar levels of these cigarettes. The bearing that the
high nitrate level of the stems had on this result was not analyzed.
In summary, the whole topic of nitrate addition and the use of zinc
oxide to suppress toxic side effects was investigated only sketchily.
The:handling and reporting of the nitrate data is symptomatic
of a problem in the construction of the reports themselves. The
overall report summaries are extremely short and present only the
barest highlights of the work. This is probably to insure the ob-
jectivity of the report but, in fact, makes deciphering'the work
more difficult. This is especially true in regard to relating work
from different series. Such relations must be minimized due to vari-
ations in blends and construction. However, work on areas such as
nitrate, paper porosities and artificial tobacco substitutes was,
carried on in several series and necessary appropriate commentary is
not given. The summaries also give no rationale for changes made
during the course of the program. For example, in the first series
of experiments the ciliatoxicity tests are done both in vitro and
in vivo.i The in vivo testing was then dropped. No rationale
89771786

- 5 -
for this major change is given in any part of the text. Also,
one of the primary reasons to repeat the artificial smoking
material work was a problem with the solubility of the conden-
sates. This is discussed in the experimental section on prepara-
tion of the condensates but never in the summaries. Another pro-
blem is that the summaries deal almost exclusively with results
from the dermal bioassays. The toxicity tests are barely mentioned.
There are several compounds such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides
and formaldehyde which increase potency in the tumorigenicity '
test but decrease it in the various toxicity tests. The tumori-
genicity results are the only ones mentioned in the summaries. There
are certain compounds where the whole concept of correlating their
concentrations to certain test results is highly dubious. For ex-
ample, carbon monoxide concentration is measured in the tobacco smoke.
Yet the tumorigenicity test is run with smoke condensate. Clearly,
any mathematical relationship drawn is essentially meaningless.
Additionally, the analytical data, of several important chemical con-
stitutents is of low quality. Methods available for measurement of
such smoke components as formaldehyde and nitrogen oxides are not as
reliable as some others. This results in widely varying correlations
between concentrations and potency results. In the case of oxides
of nitrogen the correlation of concentration to increased inhibition
of cilia transport is 0.47 in one series and -0.05 in another. The
former number indicates that inhibition is moderately dependent on
oxides of nitrogen concentration while the latter means there is
essentially no relationship. Which of these is to be believed?
Similarly, the formaldehyde concentrations in the cytotoxicity tests
range from 0.85 in the experimental filter work to -0.04 in Series
#4. These anomalies demonstrate that the data in these reports must
be understood in terms of their experimental and chemical reliability.
There are many statistics generated that have little or no validity.
This point can best be emphasized by noting that one of the most
positive correlations to tumorgenic activity was drawn to the moisture
content bf the smoke.
The nomeclature used in the statistical sections can also be
confusing. In the Series #1 dermal bioassay results, the various
blends and their components are related to two numbers PF and PFH.
PF is the percentage of mice who survive the test tumorfree by staff
observation. PFH is the the percentage tumorfree by histophathologidal
testing. PFH is a 28% higher than PF in Series #1. In Series #2
this diff erence is 19% but both numbers are called PF and only the
data tables are labelled as to whether PF is from visual or verified
data. The visual data is dropped altogether from Series #3 and #4
and all PF's are based on verified data. This makes it very easy
to compiie two completely separate sets of correlations. The discre-
pancy can be serious. For example, in Series #1 the Code 16 cigar-
ettes, which represent a simple variation in RTS density ranked
second best by PFH and tenth by PF.
In addition to simple correlations of potency levels to indivi-
dual physical and chemical parameters, correlations are also drawn to
groups of such parameters. The.groupings were generally the chemical
composition of the blend, smoke and smoke condensate and the physical
characteristics of the construction. In the first two series the re-
lationships between members of different groups were analyzed. Thus,
89773787

6
the dependencies of such things as nicotine or carbon monoxide
yield on the burn rate or paper porosity were examined. These
statistics are interesting in and of themselves but are unfortu-
nately not included in the reports of the last two series.
CONCLUSION
It should first be noted that the observations in this report
are in no way inclusive of all the data and results developed in
the Smoking and Health Program. Only some of the more important
results and obvious omissions and/or inconstituencies have been
noted. Several additional points should be made. First, in all
these tests hydrogen cyanide exhibited the most consistently high
correlations with toxicity. Thus, steps to eliminate this com-
pound are of high importance. The pair of hydrogen cyanide and
acrolein,also showed very high correlations even though acrolein
itself did not. If this is evidence of a synergistic effect then
efforts to remove acrolein could be very beneficial in cutting the
overall toxicity of smoke. The removal of hydrogen cyanide was
one of the aims in the experimental filter work. It was shown
that this could be partially accomplished by incorporating potas-
sium bicarbonate into the filter. Such filters are also of interest
for another reason. Examinations of the data reveals that on a per
puff basis the potassium bicarbonate filter increased the nicotine
yield 55%. This is one of the aims of the current nicotine project.
Preparation of experimental cigarettes with such filters will be
commenced in the near future.
There is one physical characteristic of the cigarettes in
this study which correlates very well with tumorigenic activity;
this is the static burn rate. In fact, this correlates better
than the tar yields do. Thus, it is possible that the burn rate
alters the composition of the tar and its subsequent physiological
effect. This could, for example, reflect a lowering of the relative
amounts of high molecular weight polyaromatics. Research into this
area could be very valuable. Comments are currently being made in
the press about the higher nicotine/tar ratios in today's cigarettes
and the concept of nicotine being a "co-carcinogen." The inference
is then made that little benefit is derived by switching to a low
tar cigarette. If it could be demonstrated that the high burn rate
of today's cigarettes alters the tar composition in a positive manner
an effective answer to the previous argument would be in hand.
Finally, it should be noted that the data from the Smoking and
Health Program was seminal in the evolution of the "co-carcinogen"
concept for nicotine. Any discussion on this ill-understood area
must include this work. Since work is still continuing on "co-car-
cinogenic" activity, for example, Reference 7, this research must
be closely monitored by the industry and its impact on public
attitudes assessed. oD
~
N
~
GO
Go

REFERENCES
1. Report No. 1. "Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes,"
Gio B. Gori, 'ed., DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76-905 (1976).
2. Report No. 2, "Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes,"
Gio B. Gori, ed., DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76-1111 (1976).
3. Report No. 3, "Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes,"
Gio B. Gori, ed., DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 77-1280 (1977).
4. Report No. 4, "Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes,"
Gio B. Gori, ed., DHEW Publication No. (NIH) - (1980).
5. Report No. 5, "Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes: Summary,"
DHEW Publication No. - (1980).
6. "Chemistry and In Vitro Bioassay of Smoke from Experimental
Filter Cigarettes," G. B. Gori, ed., DHEW Publication No. (NIH)
76-1076 (1976).
7. Danbury Report "A Safe Cigarette?," G. B. Gori, F. G. Boch,
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1980.

Appendix A
Description of Testing Procedures
Mouse Dermal Bioassays - ICR Swissfemale mice were the test
animals for this study. The mice were caged in groups of ten
after random selection. Several control groups were established.
The first received no treatment at all, the second merely had
their hair clipped. Hair clipping and skin painting with acetone
comprised the next control and the last was painted with benzo (a)
pyrene. The test animals were painted with two different levels
of condensate, usually 25 or 50 mg, on a daily basis. Data were
kept on survival rate, latent period of tumors, tumor volume,
number and total dose of smoke condensate, acetone, or benzo (a)
pyrene, group average body weights and experimental day of death.
During the study, animals which died or were sacrificed were re-
cropsied and all tissues fixed in formalin. The duration of these
bioassays was 18 months. Treatment was discontinued at this time
and surviving animals sacrificed and recropsied.
Ciliatoxicity Tests
In Vitro - The trachea was removed ~rom chickens immediately
after sacrifice and mounted on a Lucite R trachea holder. The
trachea was rinsed with Tyrode's solution to remove mucus and
placed in an exposure chamber at an angle of 90 from the horizontal.
A solution of 12% eggwhite in Tyrode's solution was pumped on to the
lower end of the trachea to promote a constant and reproducible
level of ciliary activity. Small numbers of tracer particles (lyco-
podium spores or soot particles) were applied to the trachea and
the intrinsic ciliary activity measured by time necessary to move
the parti'cles 5 mm. The trachea was then exposed to the mainstream
smoke of one experimental cigarette and the 5 mm movement time re-
measured., Comparison of the movement times gave the percent in-
hibition of ciliary activity.
In Vivo - White Leghorn hens were anesthetized and strapped
into an especially designed holder. The inner surface of the upper
part of the trachea was exposed by manipulation of the larynx and
movement of tracer particles observed as in the in vitro study.
Inhibition of Macrophages - Macrophages harvested from rabbit lungs
were exposed to a laboratory strain of Staphylococcus albus. The
removal of the bacteria from the test suspension was measured after
48 hours. The test colonies were exposed to one 35 ml puff of smoke
du'ring this period. Controls included colonies which contained
either no macrophages or no smoke. The differences in bacterial
counts were taken as a measure of the inhibition of the phagocytic
activity of the macrophages.
Cytotoxicity - Inhibition of mammalian cell growth in culture was
assessed in this test. The KB human tumor cell line was exposed to
aliquots of aqueous solutions of smoke condensate. After 72 hours
of growth at 37°C, the cell sheets were washed, digested, and pro-
tein levels measured. Controls included cultures with no smoke con-
densate or no cells. -
